Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Jul 2000 20:17:11 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc:        arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kernel printf %i?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007102015280.1115-100000@green.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000710150556.I25571@fw.wintelcom.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

> any objections:

Can you give me a good reason for it?  To act like the libc printf() isn't
a good reason, I mean do you think it will actually help anyone in ways
that %d doesn't?  Are you noticing tons of submissions of kernel code that
have %i and don't work correctly or something?

I just don't get it :-/

> -- 
> -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
> "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."

--
 Brian Fundakowski Feldman           \  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!  /
 green@FreeBSD.org                    `------------------------------'



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007102015280.1115-100000>