Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 13:45:25 +0200 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Normalzeit?=) From: Lukas Ertl <le@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: atapicam(4) as KLD? Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.61.0410141343500.2552@korben> In-Reply-To: <200410141341.29774.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> References: <20041013205141.GA874@galgenberg.net> <20041014105927.GU718@empiric.icir.org> <200410141341.29774.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Easy workaround: Put atapicam into GENERIC. I'm waiting for that to happen > ever since atapicam entered the tree. How hard would it be to offer multiple different GENERIC kernels at the install stage, and the user can decide which one to install? One with atapicam, one without... (this is not limited to atapicam, of course). cheers, le -- Lukas Ertl http://homepage.univie.ac.at/l.ertl/ le@FreeBSD.org http://people.freebsd.org/~le/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.WNT.4.61.0410141343500.2552>