Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:36:22 +0300 (EEST) From: Adrian Penisoara <ady@warpnet.ro> To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -stable (in)stability (was Re: Best version of FBSD for INN ?) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909261014160.11864-100000@ady.warpnet.ro> In-Reply-To: <37EDC768.D9D8A03E@gorean.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, Doug wrote: > Please don't crosspost. Thanks. > Sorry, but I think this is needed in order to attract attention on -hackers; if I'm wrong please let me know. > Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > > > And - to add to this - I still can freeze up my pentium > > laptop rather quickly (3.2-RELEASE > > This would be a lot more useful if you were actually using -Stable. As > it is there is no way to know if any of the hundreds of changes between > your -Release and the present have improved (or for that matter > worsened) your situation. Judging from my experiences I'd say the problem got introduced sometime in the month of August -- eversince that, though I tracked -stable, the problem manifested continously. But there is something that we should pay attention: Alan Cox's patch on sys/i386/include/atomic.h,sys/i386/i386/atomic.c (committed 24th August in RELENG_3) and Luigi's suggested patch on sys/vm/vm_object.h -- you can get the details tracking the "3.2-STABLE hangs after several hours" thread started 19th August on -stable. Re-reading the thread I realise that the problems seem to have started on 28th July -- at least 6th August for me. Could someone suggest me a way to catch where the problem hides itself ? Could "INVARIANTS" in kernel help me ? Thanks, Ady (@warpnet.ro) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9909261014160.11864-100000>