Date: Sat, 9 May 2015 22:05:15 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jordan.hubbard@gmail.com> To: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RPi2 support... Message-ID: <B018348D-F24D-4E3C-8B8A-CE55890BC5A4@mail.turbofuzz.com> In-Reply-To: <2DD4D1CE-E05B-44D7-B396-92BB4CD1D98D@kientzle.com> References: <0FD2F2B4EF6E490B9DB6CEF1119ECB70@ad.peach.ne.jp> <2DD4D1CE-E05B-44D7-B396-92BB4CD1D98D@kientzle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On May 9, 2015, at 9:16 PM, Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> wrote: >=20 > I just grabbed the latest FreeBSD source tree and up-to-date > Crochet and had no problems building and booting an image > for my new RPi2. Thanks for your work on this. >=20 > I haven=E2=80=99t done much with it yet, but 4 cores and 1G RAM will > certainly be fun to play with. Hi Tim, Seeing as how integral Crochet is to building FreeBSD/ARM, I was just = curious what the roadmap for it is. Is it going to enter the FreeBSD = tree as an additional build tool, or is there some plan to eventually = have =E2=80=9Cmake release=E2=80=9D simply cross-build for the various = ARM platforms with the Crochet arguments / build options being subsumed = into that, or=E2=80=A6 ? I think FreeBSD/ARM is pretty strategic for FreeBSD, obviously, so = anything which makes it more of a first-class citizen can=E2=80=99t be = anything but a good thing, no? Thanks, - Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B018348D-F24D-4E3C-8B8A-CE55890BC5A4>