Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 11:25:06 -0400 From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" <kaleb@ics.com> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Producing non-GPLed tools for FreeBSD Message-ID: <362CAB52.2DAE8B0A@ics.com> References: <Your message of "Mon, 19 Oct 1998 10:11:23 MDT." <4.1.19981019130712.065ac610@mail.lariat.org> <4.1.19981019134220.065a3be0@mail.lariat.org> <362B9D4D.500216A0@ics.com> <199810201513.IAA04309@austin.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Polstra wrote: > > In article <362B9D4D.500216A0@ics.com>, > Kaleb S. KEITHLEY <kaleb@ics.com> wrote: > > > I didn't steal the Intel supplement to the ABI when I left my last job, > > No, we don't differ from it > on our ELF systems (or on our a.out systems either). Right. That was my point: gcc would have had to conform to it, and there would have been no reason for 386BSD to have changed it, or any of *BSD to have changed it. So, where is the FreeBSD ABI defined?!? -- Kaleb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?362CAB52.2DAE8B0A>