Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 13:49:16 +0100 From: John <freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is building kernel in /sys/amd64/conf depreciated in 11 ? Message-ID: <20151021124916.GA8638@potato.growveg.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1510202352060.26829@multics.mit.edu> References: <20151020164013.GA43495@potato.growveg.org> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1510202352060.26829@multics.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:55:04PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >Why is your kernel build pulling in bsd.port.mk? Please post src.conf and >make.conf. [make.conf] MALLOC_PRODUCTION=yes WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=16 [src.conf] PORTS_MODULES=x11/nvidia-driver >This is not exactly an answer to your question, but buildkernel has been >the preferred way to build a kernel for at least four major releases. The >manual-config method has limped along because enough of the old-guard of >committers has it in finger memory, but manual-config has been excised >from the handbook for quite some time. It answers my question ;) Though never a commiter, I have been using FreeBSD as a server OS since 2.0.5 and as a desktop since 2.1.7 so your comment about old-guard applies to me for sure ;) I'll recompile the newer way in future. Thanks for the info. -- John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151021124916.GA8638>