Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:16:49 +0100 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211561 - head/cddl/lib/drti Message-ID: <64B55A11-14C3-4297-93F6-40BA74854F98@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20100821135908.GT2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <201008211348.o7LDm55c070981@svn.freebsd.org> <20100821135908.GT2396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 Aug 2010, at 14:59, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 01:48:05PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote: >> Author: rpaulo >> Date: Sat Aug 21 13:48:04 2010 >> New Revision: 211561 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/211561 >>=20 >> Log: >> Link drti.o with a PIC version of libelf. This is needed because >> drti.o depends on libelf and this avoids linking every other drti.o >> program (namely programs with USDT probes) with libelf. > What is wrong with having libelf as dependency of the resulting > binary ? The resulting binary can be a library. If I add drti.o to the libthr = library, every other program will break because it can't find libelf = symbols. The only way to fix it would be to rebuild every program that = depends on libthr and I don't want that to happen. Regards, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?64B55A11-14C3-4297-93F6-40BA74854F98>