Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 22:13:45 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu Cc: rich@rich.isdn.bcm.tmc.edu, torstenb@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: xpm static library Message-ID: <199610160513.WAA19389@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961016001625.887B-100000@baud.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Wed, 16 Oct 1996 00:20:57 -0400 (EDT))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > There's no reason you couldn't search /etc first for * > site.def and /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config last. Would * > that help? Rich * * Well, that satisfies me, sort of. It doesn't give me direct control over * it, but that's probably all to the good. I think at this point it's time * to get the suggestion reviewed, by a different audience than ports. * * The point is to give ports some direct control over how X11 ports are * built and stored. I'm going to copy this to current, and listen to the * howls. By the way, I think Chuck is talking about host.def. site.def is not empty. Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610160513.WAA19389>