Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 16:08:35 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: simon@FreeBSD.org Cc: gabor@kovesdan.org, pgj@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide article.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng article.sgml doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/policies chapter.sgml Message-ID: <20080822.160835.262777180.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20080818153942.GH1172@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <48A75B1A.7060809@FreeBSD.org> <20080817.204750.78468138.hrs@allbsd.org> <20080818153942.GH1172@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_22_16_08_35_2008_188)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <20080818153942.GH1172@zaphod.nitro.dk>: si> I have no general problem with merging www and doc closer (might be si> done while considering moving to svn?) and fully requiring having both si> for build of either, but having e.g. www/en as a deep subdir of doc/ si> seems like a rather bad idea to me. si> si> The web site and and doc/ are rather differnet beast wrt. how you si> write content so I see no problem having it in seperate top level si> directories. I agree with characteristics of www and doc are different from each other, but I personally feel there is almost no difference between having them in two separated dirs and having them in a dir. The reason why I like to have www in a subdir of doc is only for simplify the current build complexity due to the separated repos, so I am wondering how other people feel for having www in a subdir like doc/<lang>/htdocs. si> Generally, I think it would be neat (and I looked a bit of doing it a si> few years ago), but I must say I'm not sure if doing it is really si> worth the trouble compared to just making sure we don't have si> duplication of the information. That said, if somebody does it I'm si> certainly not generally against it (considering my below point). si> si> For some parts of our current site I think some of the XSLT magic is a si> bit to magic and hard to understand, so I'm a but conserned going too si> much further in that direction... Yes, I also think we should be careful about that. I will send a patch to -doc before committing for discussing the implementation. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_22_16_08_35_2008_188)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkiuZfMACgkQTyzT2CeTzy0NsQCePJI1rdQcLS6tm+LE79RKmXOV EQoAoIFP/DIEbi9Ca4ZXmgd3458XkfFu =ddYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Aug_22_16_08_35_2008_188)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080822.160835.262777180.hrs>