Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:53:34 -0800 From: "Jeff Mohler" <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> To: "Eric Anderson" <anderson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Chris Haulmark <chris@sigd.net> Subject: Re: UFS2 with SAN Message-ID: <a969fbd10702100853m3b420db3y8cbb99559ea612e9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <45CD6FF5.8070007@freebsd.org> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAAE@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <45CD6AA6.1000003@freebsd.org> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2204C9DAB0@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <45CD6FF5.8070007@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, I'm not sure what issues they had, but have had fantastic success with NFS and FreeBSD. FreeBSD with the right hardware and tweaks can make some NetApp boxes look weak. *cough* WAFL *cough* === Eric, I look forward to your white paper on that. When will we all see it? Did you fix Fbsd's nasty ../..caching issue on the client yet?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a969fbd10702100853m3b420db3y8cbb99559ea612e9>