Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 01:01:18 -0800 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: "nwhitehorn@freebsd.org" <nwhitehorn@FreeBSD.org>, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: e77cf2a4ab32 - main - Restore /boot/efi to mtree. Message-ID: <A63777FD-23F5-4B06-91D6-F1D137E26D2A@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <656E3D05-11B6-437B-B171-4894811A70CB@yahoo.com> References: <656E3D05-11B6-437B-B171-4894811A70CB@yahoo.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2021-Mar-5, at 22:05, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Nathan Whitehorn nwhitehorn at FreeBSD.org wrote on > Sat Mar 6 02:01:30 UTC 2021 : > >> Restore /boot/efi to mtree. >> >> Instead of whether /boot/efi exists, which it now always does, including >> on systems that don't and can't use EFI, use whether /boot/efi is >> present in fstab to signal to the installer that it is a valid ESP and >> should be configured. This has essentially the same semantics, but allows >> /boot/efi to be created unconditionally. >> > > Sounds like the documentation about /etc/fstab content > should indicate the special/reserved /boot/efi usage > context, be that comments in initial default files or > whatever. > > I wonder if anyone puts / at the end in an fstab: /boot/efi/ > I tried using a trailing / in /etc/fstab and it is one place were the notational variation is not equivalent: I had to remove it. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A63777FD-23F5-4B06-91D6-F1D137E26D2A>