Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Dec 2004 10:11:58 -0600 (CST)
From:      security@revolutionsp.com
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Unable to get APM working -- help!
Message-ID:  <63322.81.84.175.77.1104077518.squirrel@81.84.175.77>
In-Reply-To: <200412261946.26516.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
References:  <62903.81.84.175.77.1104000639.squirrel@81.84.175.77> <200412261731.25493.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <61469.81.84.175.77.1104037002.squirrel@81.84.175.77> <200412261946.26516.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 15:26, security@revolutionsp.com wrote:
>> I'll try it out; meanwhile, I've discovered the sysctl to change this
>> manually. I've checked it works by trying to compile something at the
>> lowest CPU clock speed. It was slow to hell :-)
>
> That's probably clock throttling which is different..

Yes, the sysctl included "throttle". As I said, I'm new to the laptop
world.. Is the power saving difference a lot if I just throttle the clock,
instead of using enhanced speed step?

>
> [Enhanced] Speed Step reduces the clock speed and the CPU core voltage..
> clock
> throttling just idles the CPU for a certain proportion of the time. If you
> want slow try forcing them both to the slowest speed.. Pentium-M 75Mhz :)
>
>> > Any chance there is a new BIOS available for that system?
>>
>> A quick googling session brought up nothing.
>
> How about say, checking the makers web site?
>

I also did, nothing :-P

>> > No.. If I try and look at a non existent battery slot it says 'device
>> not
>> > configured' so maybe it thinks you have no batteries for some strange
>> > reason.
>>
>> I've installed klaptop and it shows battery as -1 and 'not charging'
>> acpiconf -i[0-9] didn't do any good either :/
>
> Without ACPI support being able to read your battery status no userland
> program will work.
>
> Your dmesg shows acpi_cmbat entries, ie
> acpi_cmbat0: <Control Method Battery> on acpi0
> acpi_cmbat1: <Control Method Battery> on acpi0
>
> which I think is pretty fundamental to being able to read battery status
> ;)
>

Yesterday I googled a bit for my laptop name+linux and I found a post from
a guy who had the same exact problem under Linux. He had /proc/acpi but no
/proc/acpi/battery.

I know battery status can be seen, as the laptop shipped with win XP home,
which I promptly got rid of, but I installed a game there to see how many
FPS I'd get playing with the laptop. So I still messed around with it
(windows) for around 35 minutes, and could see the little battery icon
discharging.

If the acpi_cmbat0/1 shows up on dmesg, what could be wrong? Perhaps this
ACPI implementation is a bit weird and I should send a copy of my asl to
freebsd-acpi ?


>
> --
> Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
> for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
> "The nice thing about standards is that there
> are so many of them to choose from."
>   -- Andrew Tanenbaum
> GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?63322.81.84.175.77.1104077518.squirrel>