Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2014 21:55:33 -0700 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conflict between netif and pccard_ether... Message-ID: <EC40E4D6-630E-40D4-A08C-73760109A971@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20140622003452.GR31367@funkthat.com> References: <20140618231318.GH31367@funkthat.com> <201406190917.16458.jhb@freebsd.org> <20140621104031.GM31367@funkthat.com> <9318E9E1-DF4C-4126-BD93-AF215BE1720A@FreeBSD.org> <20140622003452.GR31367@funkthat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 21, 2014, at 17:34, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote this message on Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 09:54 -0700: >> On Jun 21, 2014, at 3:40, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> wrote: >>=20 >>> <wpa.diff> >>=20 >> We would prefer to submit this to the vendor, so if you can, please = make sure this code compiles only on FreeBSD while leaving the rest = untouched. >=20 > Whee diff -D! >=20 > New patch attached... Will you submit it upstream? and when can we > expect this to hit head? The upstream repository is here: http://hostap.epitest.fi/cgit/hostap/ Is there any way I can convince you to produce a patch suitable for this = repository? We can them email it to Jouni. It will be a while before I can update the tools in FreeBSD, so go ahead = and commit it. Thanks, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EC40E4D6-630E-40D4-A08C-73760109A971>