Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:25:10 +0200 From: "Pietro Cerutti" <gahr@gahr.ch> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net, Alexander Logvinov <avl@logvinov.com>, the_paya@gentoo.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Reduce namespace pollution on zlib.h Message-ID: <20100331102509.GI34892@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <868w9elego.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <4BACFE18.7010309@delphij.net> <86wrwylji0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4BAD509B.3080805@delphij.net> <86ljdelhgd.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4BAD62CF.6090901@delphij.net> <868w9elego.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--k+G3HLlWI7eRTl+h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2010-Mar-27, 02:51, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: > Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> writes: > > So... May I consider my import just exposed some existing bugs in other > > applications and we don't want to workaround these issues? >=20 > Correct. Just to make it clear so that everyone knows how we're going to handle this: are you (src people) going to commit a fix to unexpose LFS crap or are we (ports people) supposed to fix each and every single port that supposes to be on Linux? The attentive reader will note a bias towards the former :) --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --k+G3HLlWI7eRTl+h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkuzIwUACgkQwMJqmJVx944OwACgiL36ea+2aigN9/+ihTOUr7+Q CNsAmwWI2KEDRmKkblW9+OLqpT/jYpYa =vLIB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+G3HLlWI7eRTl+h--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100331102509.GI34892>