Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:50:28 -0600 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org> To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> Cc: bohra@cs.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: testers needed for CAM INVARIANTS fix Message-ID: <20030903045028.GA79697@panzer.kdm.org> In-Reply-To: <20030902124313.N7825@news1.macomnet.ru> References: <20030901221335.GA66968@panzer.kdm.org> <20030902124313.N7825@news1.macomnet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:46:16 +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > Hi Ken, > > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, 16:13-0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > > I've got a fix for the panic from the cd(4)/da(4) drivers when INVARIANTS > > is turned on in -stable. > > > > The fix is to create a task queue that runs in a thread context and use > > that to create the sysctl variables needed by cd(4) and da(4). The > > eventual fix will be to move the CAM transport layer probe code into a > > kernel thread. > > > > Anyway, these patches work for me, but if I could get some feedback from > > people running with INVARIANTS turned on in -stable, I'd appreciate it. > > > > If it seems to work for people, I'll talk to re@ about getting this in > > before 4.9 goes out the door. > > It seems it works. I am running my usuall stress tests now, thanks a > lot. patch(1)-friendly diff is there: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~maxim/diff/cam.sysctl.stable.20030901 Thanks for testing it. I just committed the -current version of the above patches, I'll work on getting into -stable now. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030903045028.GA79697>