Date: Thu, 5 Dec 1996 22:26:35 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?Andrey_Chernov=2C_=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= <ache@nagual.ru> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.freebsd.org>, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-include@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include utmp.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961205222445.1637A-100000@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <9893.849812774@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Simple questions: Is there concensus for bumping UT_HOSTSIZE to the > next increment? 32 or 64? What about the other fields that Peter > suggested? I like 64 and ut_hostid. I see to many hosts in nowdays which breaks 32. -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.961205222445.1637A-100000>