Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:51:21 -0700 From: ray@redshift.com To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel [memory] tweaking question Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20050407015121.00aaeee8@pop.redshift.com> In-Reply-To: <20050407083639.GD57256@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <3.0.1.32.20050405052601.00ab4388@pop.redshift.com> <42518AC9.5070208@comcast.net> <3.0.1.32.20050405052601.00ab4388@pop.redshift.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Great run down, thanks Peter - I will do more checking in those areas. Ray At 06:36 PM 4/7/2005 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: | On Tue, 2005-Apr-05 05:26:01 -0700, ray@redshift.com wrote: | >options SHMALL= | >options SHMMAX= | >options SHMMAXPGS= | >options SHMMIN= | >options SHMMNI= | >options SHMSEG= | | These are all reasonably well documented in sys/conf/NOTES. If you | want more detail, try a SystemV-oriented Unix book | | >I understand these control shared memory and how many semaphores the | >kernel can allocate, | | Close - they only control SystemV shared memory. Sane shared memory | is available via mmap(2). SystemV semaphores are controlled via | SEMxxx options. Posix semaphores are listed as 'experimental'. | | > but I guess what I'm not 100% clear on is how | >the kernel uses these resources when it comes to running something | >like Apache or MySQL on a heavily loaded server. | | These values all define limits on the amount of shared memory | available system-wide (SHMALL and SHMMNI) and to a single process | (remaining options). As far as I can tell, neither Apache nor MySQL | use any SystemV IPC on FreeBSD. (The only thing that I've found that | does use SHM is X in some modes). | | > In other words, for | >something like Apache, how much shared memory is required? | | None. | | > Or what | >would adding additional shared memory and/or semaphores provide. | | Nothing. | | >Does the default # provided for by FreeBSD create a problem and/or | >would it use additional ram if allocated? | | Actually using SystemV IPC will use additional RAM. | | >Is there the anyone on the list that has experience with changing | >these that can provide a clear, down to earth explanation as to their | >impacts? | | I have used them on other Unices but never needed to tweak them on | FreeBSD. Before adjusting anything, use ipcs(1) to confirm that | they are being used. If you seem to be reaching limits (ipcs shows | that you are close to system limits or the applications are reporting | allocation errors), then just increase the parameter related to | whatever you are running out of. | | -- | Peter Jeremy | |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.20050407015121.00aaeee8>