Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 07:19:19 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New firewall section (was: Re: HEADS UP: doc/ slush begins) Message-ID: <20040921041919.GA32654@igloo.linux.gr> In-Reply-To: <200409201659.00842.so14k@so14k.com> References: <20040918.161309.35654157.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20040920110628.GA2493@submonkey.net> <20040920133025.GB38865@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <200409201659.00842.so14k@so14k.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2004-09-20 16:59, Brad Davis <so14k@so14k.com> wrote: > > : + <para>The IPFW sample rule set (found in > > : + <filename>/etc/rc.firewall</filename>) delivered in the basic [...] > > > > What are the ``service ports'' referred to here? > > This does need better wording.. I can't come up with anything right now. I'll see if I can come up with something. > > : + <para>The OpenBSD PF user's guide is here: > > : + <ulink url="http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/index.html"></ulink>. > > : + </para> > > > > Please trim the unnecessary whitespace here too. > > Well the period is at line 71, so I pushed the </para> down so I > wouldn't go over the 72 line rule. IMHO, it's ok to keep longer lines in the source when there is no obvious way to split the text. > Also I have encountered an undefined &man.ipnat.8 That should have been &man.ipnat.1;. I was writing the comments in a haste and didn't check my entities, but we can easily fix that :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040921041919.GA32654>