Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:49:37 +0300 From: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> To: Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/devfs devfs_rule.c Message-ID: <20040122074937.GB1013@mobile.acsolutions.com> In-Reply-To: <200401211643.i0LGhT43093728@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200401211643.i0LGhT43093728@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:43:29AM -0800, Colin Percival wrote: > cperciva 2004/01/21 08:43:29 PST > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/fs/devfs devfs_rule.c > Log: > Allow devfs path rules to work on directories. Without this fix, > devfs rule add path fd unhide > is a no-op, while it should unhide the fd subdirectory. Does this affect /etc/defaults/devfs.rules? I am assuming that the 'add hide' in the first ruleset will now also hide /dev/fd (where it previously didn't). In that case will the 'add path fd/* unhide' in a later rule unhide the fd/ directory? Does it need a separate 'add fd unhide'? Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | Fingerprint: 00E8 61BC 0D75 7FFB E4D3 6BF1 B239 D010 3215 D418 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - Unleash the Daemon !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040122074937.GB1013>