Date: Mon, 1 Jul 1996 09:51:46 +0800 (SST) From: Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@pacific.net.sg> To: Brian Tao <taob@io.org> Cc: Kenneth Merry <ken@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu>, security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is "routed -q" necessary? Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960701095015.28014E-100000@einstein.technet.sg> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960630195358.18686K-100000@zap.io.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Jun 1996, Brian Tao wrote: > Since I only have one default router anyway, there is no need to > run routed at all? I figured it might help keep the routing tables > down to a manageable size, with static and dynamic IP connections > coming and going all the time. Yup, and tell your router not to [bm]cast routing info onto your single-homed LAN, too. - PS -- Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@pacific.net.sg> * Finger for PGP key. Pacific Internet Pte Ltd * Singapore Fast, secure, cheap. Pick two.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.3.91.960701095015.28014E-100000>