Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 12:45:30 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: curthread vs. passing thread pointers around Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0203291244530.726-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20020329202504.GZ93885@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> [020329 11:55] wrote: > > In message <20020329194158.GX93885@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes: > > >* John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> [020329 11:32] wrote: > > >> During a discussion on the smp@ list about changes to the suser() > > >> API to make use of td_ucred, [...] > > > > On a related note: I intend to change the open/close/ioctl interface > > to device drivers from a "struct thread *" to a "struct ucred *". > > What about people (ab)?using the device driver interface for proc > related stuff? then they can (AB)use curthread.. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0203291244530.726-100000>