Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 May 2006 14:50:11 +0200
From:      "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/www Makefile ports/www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
Message-ID:  <20060525125011.GI1088@zaphod.nitro.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20060524.080053.02263801.hrs@allbsd.org>
References:  <200605231912.k4NJCPNb092183@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060523193029.GA1111@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20060524.080053.02263801.hrs@allbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2006.05.24 08:00:53 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote
>   in <20060523193029.GA1111@zaphod.nitro.dk>:
>=20
> si> On 2006.05.23 19:12:24 +0000, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> si> > hrs         2006-05-23 19:12:24 UTC
> si> >
> si> >   FreeBSD ports repository
> si> >
> si> >   Modified files:
> si> >     .                    modules
> si> >     www                  Makefile
> si> >   Added files:
> si> >     www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist
> si> >   Log:
> si> >   Revert changes related to linux-flashplugin* removal.
> si>
> si> Hmm, is this really a good idea?  It has a rather serious security
> si> vulnerability which is unlikely to get fixed.
>=20
>  Ah, I just wanted to revert all my changes related to the
>  flashplugin removal first.  As of the removal, www/linuxpluginwrapper
>  still depended on www/linux-flashplugin6.
>=20
>  I also think it is good to remove this because of the security flaw,
>  but is it true that in such cases we need to set DEPRECATED and
>  EXPIRATION_DATE in advance?  Or, is it no problem with removing
>  it immediately?

Normally I use EXPIRATION_DATE, but since this has already been
deleted once I don't see a big need to wait with removing it again,
but that's up to you.  As long as it keeps the FORBIDDEN tag I don't
have a problem with waiting a bit.

--=20
Simon L. Nielsen

--zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEdagDh9pcDSc1mlERAl4AAJ9ROi6agoVsue7ESWzAPamddJeX1QCfWpzg
dpycBH1fAUBr3smOWLmn+SY=
=C7ZC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--zjcmjzIkjQU2rmur--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060525125011.GI1088>