Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:28:47 -0400 From: Stephen R Guglielmo <srguglielmo@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD recommends not using base unbound for an authoritative server Message-ID: <20150317192847.5b39d1c8@lapsdeb> In-Reply-To: <CAPi0pssPrcJgF71AvQ-M1RZt=%2Btv=6FTGtwhi9_bX6-Q-7b7cQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPi0pssPrcJgF71AvQ-M1RZt=%2Btv=6FTGtwhi9_bX6-Q-7b7cQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/roZqb2L4AvujN/jt+fzWjRY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:25:09 -0700 Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> wrote: > For the same reasons, I'd like to run the base system's unbound to > authoritatively host my DNS... but FreeBSD is discouraging me in > section 29.7.2 of the manual. Why the discouragement? Unbound is only a validating caching resolver. It *can't* be authoritative. --Sig_/roZqb2L4AvujN/jt+fzWjRY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVCLi2AAoJEA8nk/BQet6Lwi8P/jUNMEcKc7LViap07mQOBKvO LuD+URZ0hl2mYX/BbfXBUxfrAf2sRMdukzQVD50fmp2h2bTSPORrr5NoZ4vMjr6L R3YcUYTKtWoRS4iYp2MIODZv5/Eekt4sAHMvSbfLRfiQ6yIEwrdxNogzlM34rHn2 q2+iri+jPPked9cWtg0LJGOB50mf5Iq5bednwrqzEX3/ZKsFWbLCqSgFISCHiwxU 2a56NbS68JS6FhDw4o88bjf4AAD7YUw/FZoBpL562MdRlsGkVozQO/6S4g5s/gIh +6NQNwq2/uPzGI1N3tXF/naQUGF+WF5htYJe3k6jW7yFS8PWB5dV/ADMk0M/S6pC ef890aXKsnPZ2NCILivq0AlhZSp7XxJ4SQ1oizx/xqJnpPHMJglx9IMGUi7bJphl kJOedRcaY9QhM8MhqYtid7zKgBJQWxHl1P6jFUu/djeV6aQCIcF8xfco8rHz9zrW 0wY3c0EUZde286Cv7uRq0SgIpS9+noBZiSRWOA5/IoehGAZIZnyv0ulHO9iSpNhN ltxFCzySQScVDgeh+CO2CHRTPCYCOk1bJr/VaKbGw1bKHMEhX6otjZWH/0u9XhXK b8GK/62GRjoEniLyNERVhWvghM17DU05m3Vew98PfVUtWVkxR7wK/Jzr+afWImOK HSe3A5dzFuwakyBJSqlm =vLDE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/roZqb2L4AvujN/jt+fzWjRY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150317192847.5b39d1c8>