Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:52:30 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/hpfs hpfs_vnops.c src/sys/fs/msdosfs msdosfs_denode.c src/sys/fs/nullfs null_vnops.c src/sys/fs/smbfs smbfs_node.c src/sys/gnu/ext2fs ext2_inode.c src/sys/isofs/cd9660 cd9660_node.c src/sys/kern vfs_subr.c src/sys/sys vnode.h ... Message-ID: <20050301105230.GL3322@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20050301093736.GH81082@elvis.mu.org> References: <20050228233939.GB81082@elvis.mu.org> <53871.1109636277@critter.freebsd.dk> <20050301093736.GH81082@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--UC+RhZhEc8lcmajv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 01:37:36AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> [050228 16:18] wrote: > >=20 > > The ABI is already broken for filesystem modules as far as I > > know, but if I'm wrong we can revert it. >=20 > I'm not sure you're right but either way progress is good, and 5.x > needs the work. >=20 > How about we play nice after 5.4 or even 5.5 when 5 has more widespread > adoption? We already told everyone that we wouldn't break for 5.4. Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --UC+RhZhEc8lcmajv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCJEluocfcwTS3JF8RAsUHAKCXjPv3LGxiDEe3Nz5UyrYqWvg/9wCfd0cU ngwTOasNTOHVsP4RiSLj/TY= =dK34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UC+RhZhEc8lcmajv--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050301105230.GL3322>