Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 22:00:09 -0700 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Phil Schulz" <ph.schulz@gmx.de> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: RE: GPL vs BSD Licence Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEJCEPAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <418212DB.1010305@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Phil Schulz [mailto:ph.schulz@gmx.de] > Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 2:52 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: davids@webmaster.com; chat@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: GPL vs BSD Licence > > > So I cannot use GPL'ed (vs LGPL'ed) library for software w/o placing > the result under the GPL? Correct - per the FSF's interpretation of the GPL. > I think I'm realizing once again that I don't fully get the GNU > interpretation of "free". To me, "free" means more sth like "here, take > it and do what you want w/ it, but don't bother me if you screw up" > which is why I favour BSD-style licensed software. > I don't think that anyone really gets anything that RMS says about anything. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEJCEPAA.tedm>