Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 21:31:05 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Lewis Thompson <purple@lewiz.info> Cc: Kenny Freeman <kennyf@pchg.net> Subject: Re: Jail FS questions. Message-ID: <20031009212824.Q28590@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20031010002458.GG587@lewiz.org> References: <20030803200948.GA10712@lewiz.org> <200310091700.09658.kennyf@pchg.net> <20031009211629.T28590@ganymede.hub.org> <20031010002458.GG587@lewiz.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Lewis Thompson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:17:12PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Lewis Thompson wrote: > > > > > > Anyway, nullfs is great for "remounting" > > > > parts of the file system. > > > > > > Yeah, right now I'm using NFS mounts, which is a bit ugly, to say the > > > least. Since I had troubles with union I steered clear of nullfs, since > > > the same ``slippery dog'' warning exists ;) > > > > pluto# df -t union | wc -l > > 65 > > > > What kind of troubles? > > Just causing system reboots. Randomly. > > Also, for some reason it doesn't seem to propogate permissions, which > is annoying for using them as the bases for jails. system reboots: what version of OS? permissions: do you have a way I can "test this"? Note that I run ~150 jails right now across 4 servers, with unionfs used to shared applications across them all to save on disk space ... I haven't had a unionfs related panic of the server in quite awhile now (but I run -STABLE faithfully), and haven't experienced any 'permissions' problems that I know of, or that anyone has ever pointed out to me ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031009212824.Q28590>