Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:35:58 +0100 From: Florian Smeets <flo@FreeBSD.org> To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ca_root_nss fails to install if /etc/ssl/cert.pem alredy exists Message-ID: <4F4C135E.6020601@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4F4C0942.2000002@aldan.algebra.com> References: <201202261434.q1QEYMbN006147@narawntapu.narawntapu> <4F4C0164.9090005@FreeBSD.org> <4F4C0942.2000002@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 27.02.12 23:52, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 27.02.2012 17:19, Florian Smeets wrote: >> maybe I'm missing something but this should not happen because of >> >> %%ETCSYMLINK%%@cwd / >> %%ETCSYMLINK%%etc/ssl/cert.pem > Not sure... I had the update fail for me because the link was still there... > Maybe, it is because I did not have the ETCSYMLINK option on, when I installed > the earlier version of the package -- and created the symlink manually afterwards. > > Whatever the reason the entry exists at install time, the port should not be > failing to register itself (after the complete installation) because of it. >> On deinstall the symlink should be removed. And that seems to work here. >> >> Also if we consider the patch shouldn't it be || instead of&& ? > Oh, yes, of course. Thanks! Yours, > Committed. Thanks. Florian [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAk9ME18ACgkQapo8P8lCvwkgxACfeBiJezikj9CKgNEN6ljokbOc 9EUAn1jh26SXziKRz50gTgkUhhnwVCJC =nore -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4C135E.6020601>