Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:50:55 -0600 From: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com> To: david@farmington.k12.mo.us Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issues with email migration Message-ID: <ade45ae90910310850t924e284j47ba5de169fcb7ee@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1431.97.86.3.60.1257001137.squirrel@webmail.farmington.k12.mo.us> References: <20091030130054.589B39860E4@mail.farmington.k12.mo.us> <c39ec84c0910300635n505644f9ye573562ef7b187c5@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90910301659m56c7dc32uc756fae0a340b1c5@mail.gmail.com> <1431.97.86.3.60.1257001137.squirrel@webmail.farmington.k12.mo.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/31/09, david@farmington.k12.mo.us <david@farmington.k12.mo.us> wrote: > only one issue with that. The server in question is an emc clereon(sorry > not at work to look at the specifics) and at this point the only access I > have to it is a web interface and am unable to access a command line. > > Also a stupid question my plan is to set up another server to access the > nfs share to provide better email service. > > would this impact it in any way? <snip replies> Not if file locking and the daemons take care of everything like they should. Remember, file locking is mandatory for some things, especially mbox files, password files, or anything else that requires exclusive access to a file. If two systems try to access the same locked file, the 2nd will be told it won't be able to get an exclusive lock, because the 1st already has it locked. You're on the right track. Keep it going.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ade45ae90910310850t924e284j47ba5de169fcb7ee>