Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:00:07 -0500 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another milestone... Message-ID: <40161A87.13165.5323523@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040127094604.GA13559@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <40158A17.2878.2FDF2E3@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Jan 2004 at 9:46, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 09:43:51PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2003 at 22:34, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > > According to freshports.org, the addition of the palm/uppc-kmod port on > > > Mon Dec 29 16:33:02 2003 UTC has resulted in the passing of yet another > > > milestone: this took the count of available ports to 10,000. > > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/palm/uppc-kmod/Makefile > > > > > > Pretty impressive going. > > > > Not to detract from the significance, But I should be the first to > > say that FreshPorts counts ports differently to that found in > > /usr/ports/INDEX, which does not necessarily include all ports in the > > tree. > > Hmmm... yes, at the time there was a difference of about 10 between > between the FreshPorts count and INDEX on my machine. > > At least, I think that's what I counted a month ago when I sent that. > Must have gone by a RFC2549 link... There are many messages slowly tricking through like that. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40161A87.13165.5323523>