Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:37:33 -0700
From:      Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com>
To:        Michael Zhilin <mizhka@gmail.com>
Cc:        Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mips@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: MFC test request
Message-ID:  <F86B4D0D-7A63-419A-AE2C-5ACD5F2052E9@bluezbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF19XBL6nNMQF3A9ACbJHD=zMNhrKH4QGJ827we6ngJjv0P54A@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20161027172820.GA44678@bluezbox.com> <5813143B.3080308@grosbein.net> <57c4bb4f-1bba-5620-9a88-46364830c0d0@freebsd.org> <CAF19XBL6nNMQF3A9ACbJHD=zMNhrKH4QGJ827we6ngJjv0P54A@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Oct 28, 2016, at 1:34 PM, Michael Zhilin <mizhka@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> Hi Oleksandr,
>=20
> BroadCom 4716 looks fine before and after patch. I didn't check all =
functionalities, because most of them are in 12-current only.=20

Thanks a lot, Michael! Really appreciated.

Original regression was panic, so if it doesn=E2=80=99t panic - then =
both fixes combined do not introduce regression





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F86B4D0D-7A63-419A-AE2C-5ACD5F2052E9>