Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 10:20:10 +0200 From: Marcus von Appen <mva@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming of lang/pypy and lang/pypy3 Message-ID: <20130805102010.Horde.z0Uqk2RXOt3D3TAm6Wn3Fw1@webmail.df.eu> In-Reply-To: <6283190.FdUAYIpsqz@dragon.dg> References: <1595859.oJfAmeEhYc@dragon.dg> <20130801195023.GA1345@medusa.sysfault.org> <6283190.FdUAYIpsqz@dragon.dg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Naylor <naylor.b.david@gmail.com>: [...] > > Could you please elaborate how the beta's are preventing pypy from being used > as a replacement for CPython? If I would provide and maintain a production environment, in which stability and reliability is important for my customers, I would not install any software classified as beta as long as there is no important reason to do otherwise (and even a non-beta release would require heaps of testing). Not because a non-beta release is better or more stable, but because I am in a bad position for discussion with the customers, if something goes really wrong with the beta, regardless of how well it was tested. Just my 2 cents :) Cheers Marcus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130805102010.Horde.z0Uqk2RXOt3D3TAm6Wn3Fw1>