Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:04 +0800 From: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Landin Hostbaek <mich@FreeBSD.org>, Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/libtunepimp Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/audio/libtunepimp/files patch-configure Message-ID: <20060728025304.GA92930@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20060727093938.GV82058@mich2.itxmarket.com> References: <200607231405.k6NE5ewh013386@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060727091217.GN82058@mich2.itxmarket.com> <20060727093200.GA14150@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> <20060727093938.GV82058@mich2.itxmarket.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Michael Landin Hostbaek wrote:
> Cheng-Lung Sung (clsung) writes:
> > >
> > > This update breaks build for (at least):
> > > audio/amarok
> > > audio/juk
> >
> > I'll check it now, thanks.
>
> It's juk and amarok that do not have support for 0.5 yet, and as the
> tunepimp update brings API changes - it breaks the build for other apps.
> It blows my mind, that the pimps (I guess that's the name for the
> tunepimp developers) do not keep backwards support..
>
Hi,
Will they (juk/amarok) have updates in few days?
Or just set them BROKEN for a while?
--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEyXwQ+AeJ85Vui8ERAmGwAJ47E8kJbfE6taapJwGyfPPX4UJT4gCffcg0
oiig8bYqvUSWo7tQRcnZBAs=
=dglB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060728025304.GA92930>