Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:18:24 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@freebsd.org> Cc: Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r335454 - head/usr.bin/ar Message-ID: <CAPyFy2A%2BLx7CkJa74b72fvaY6G34Xkve6qPVBWdii=CPhUwjLw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201806210048.w5L0mhv8076926@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <edb98721-9255-f58b-93a2-34f26c5d8a7c@FreeBSD.org> <201806210048.w5L0mhv8076926@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 June 2018 at 20:48, Rodney W. Grimes <freebsd@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > My claim still stands, the commit message and reality do not match, > Ed claimed that he was switching to 2-clause FreeBSD license, yet > it does not appear to actually do that. The commit message could have been more clear indeed. > Does SPDX have rules for dual tagging a file? I seem to recall that > there was some way to do that at least. It does (using license1 AND/OR license2), but in this case one of the licenses is a subset of the other.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2A%2BLx7CkJa74b72fvaY6G34Xkve6qPVBWdii=CPhUwjLw>