Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 18:49:05 +0900 From: Masafumi NAKANE <max@wide.ad.jp> To: "J. Mallett" <jmallett@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/print/pdflib Makefile Message-ID: <871yckpc32.wl@turkey.aslm.rim.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20020510080026.GA5691@FreeBSD.ORG> References: <200205100648.g4A6m5979188@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020510065209.GA1084@FreeBSD.ORG> <873cx0pilc.wl@turkey.aslm.rim.or.jp> <20020510080026.GA5691@FreeBSD.ORG>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 10 May 2002 08:00:26 +0000,
J. Mallett wrote:
> Those dates, and the fact they're staggered like that, but given
> your response leads me to believe that you aren't checking out the
> RELENG_4 branch for those dates, but rather using machines where
> the world was built on those days.
>
> Is that so?
Yes, but make world was done right after cvsup'ing using
stable-supfile. So, timestamp on the files is fairly close to when
source files were checked out.
> If not, try to isolate the diffs between the last two dates, but
> I am not seeing anything...
You are right. Sources that produced these two executables didn't
have any diff.
Now, I did some more testing, and realized that the same build process
fails sometimes, and succeeds other times. So, I think there still is
possibility that the problem is with the make command, but now there
is possibility that the problem is with this specific makefile of
pdflib.
With gmake, there hasn't been any build failure, so far.
Cheers,
Max
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?871yckpc32.wl>