Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:53:11 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Vlad Galu <dudu@dudu.ro> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and MPD5 stability issues Message-ID: <AD4DEA12-0598-4E87-A03A-667B380FAC4E@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=cU97_10VCn08e94fMiF7kYO-Efw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4d705cd0d73fb0d25cc3a017eb2eb072.squirrel@mail.stsnet.ro> <4E0A210F.7050105@sentex.net> <d3018670fab77332d6a6d996bd7fd79d.squirrel@mail.stsnet.ro> <1414962521.20110628215530@nitronet.pl> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106282225560.82827@tapio.cksoft.de> <1722A449-718D-4403-A8F4-A3E733CD1518@lists.zabbadoz.net> <BANLkTi=cU97_10VCn08e94fMiF7kYO-Efw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Perhaps it would be best to document what those particular workloads are. Apparently, systems with small and seldom changing routing tables are good candidates. However, the distinction is not immediately obvious by skimming through the list archives. Start reading here: http://conferences.sigcomm.org/sigcomm/2009/workshops/presto/papers/p37.pdf patches for documentation are surely welcome by the docs people. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD4DEA12-0598-4E87-A03A-667B380FAC4E>