Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:13:03 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and zfsd Message-ID: <1381421583.19140.32451849.084D8E32@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2i5hxdp8=4sHQgu2MOjpv9jqd6D7LV-a8y7S6cuCBgYuw@mail.gmail.com> References: <5256B761.4050301@gmail.com> <CAOtMX2i5hxdp8=4sHQgu2MOjpv9jqd6D7LV-a8y7S6cuCBgYuw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013, at 10:24, Alan Somers wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Johan Hendriks <joh.hendriks@gmail.com> > wrote: > > When i started using ZFS on FreeBSD I quickly found out that hot spares are > > not possible on FreeBSD. > > I was told that with zfsd it should be possible and that it would be > > included in FreeBSD 10. > > > > Is there some info about the zfsd function and how it could be used? > > zfsd is currently not in FreeBSD/head and won't make it into 10, but > you can still get the source code from its project branch. It's being > used in production by at least two companies. > So FreeBSD is going to have inferior ZFS management compared to Solaris/Illumos/etc for another 2+ years? Why are things like this allowed to miss releases?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1381421583.19140.32451849.084D8E32>