Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 23:19:57 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 227149] Use the www/py-django meta port instead of the www/py-django18 port to move to Django 1.11 Message-ID: <bug-227149-21822-Y9wuqphq4U@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-227149-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-227149-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227149 Kai <freebsd_ports@k-worx.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #192117|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #10 from Kai <freebsd_ports@k-worx.org> --- Created attachment 196657 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D196657&action= =3Dedit django-testcase-v2.patch Now that Django 1.8 has been removed from the ports tree (thanks to all who have been involved in this) here's is an rebased and updated patch against @r478329 . Summary: - introduces "django" keyword for USE_PYTHON - valid arguments are <version>, build, run, test - <version> can be 1.11+, 1.11-2.0, -2.0 or kept blank to use the default Django version - if the Django version given by the user/ports framework doesn't match the Django version(s) in a port's Makefile the port will be ignored. QA: ~~~ - Tested on 11.2-RELEASE with Django 1.11, 2.0 and 2.1 as default versions If this approach makes sense I would open a review for it in phabricator. In that case please let me know who I should add as reviewers. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227149-21822-Y9wuqphq4U>