Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 22:26:37 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: simon@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/www Makefile ports/www/linux-flashplugin6 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist Message-ID: <20060525.222637.07580277.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060525125011.GI1088@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20060523193029.GA1111@zaphod.nitro.dk> <20060524.080053.02263801.hrs@allbsd.org> <20060525125011.GI1088@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_25_22_26_37_2006_035)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> wrote in <20060525125011.GI1088@zaphod.nitro.dk>: si> On 2006.05.24 08:00:53 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: si> > I also think it is good to remove this because of the security flaw, si> > but is it true that in such cases we need to set DEPRECATED and si> > EXPIRATION_DATE in advance? Or, is it no problem with removing si> > it immediately? si> si> Normally I use EXPIRATION_DATE, but since this has already been si> deleted once I don't see a big need to wait with removing it again, si> but that's up to you. As long as it keeps the FORBIDDEN tag I don't si> have a problem with waiting a bit. Thanks, I set EXPIRATION_DATE to June 7 since I do not want to give an impression of sudden occurrence again just like the flashplugin removal ;) -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_25_22_26_37_2006_035)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBEdbCQTyzT2CeTzy0RAgaoAJ4qRf8sPr9kvdkSnVgiuD00JSWfggCcDIIP ivanfxzqz4RJBflN711+DTg= =ThpN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Thu_May_25_22_26_37_2006_035)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060525.222637.07580277.hrs>