Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:41:34 -0400 From: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@rogers.com> To: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] anjuta-devel update Message-ID: <ptnuevgaib64uupp6it6hv3kjm9vg743cl@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <1055862346.333.34.camel@asa.gascom.net.ru> References: <1055862346.333.34.camel@asa.gascom.net.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 17 Jun 2003 19:05:47 +0400, you wrote: >I've made anjuta-devel and scintilla patches so, than it now uses system >scintilla. Scintilla is also updated to 1.53. With newer system >scintilla anjuta-1.1.1 works _very_ stable, but font antialiasing in >editor window is gone. I think scintilla update must be committed anyway >with possible empty neighbour port like scintilla-gtk2. Why would you downgrade Anjuta this way? One of the key points to moving to Gnome2/GTK2 is for antialiased fonts so removing them from Anjuta seems to be a backward step. Similarly, changing the Anjuta code base in a dramatic way is only going to cause problems for the Anjuta developers and FreeBSD users (sorry, we can't help FreeBSD users with their problems because =46reeBSD is not using our codebase, etc.). While I can understand the desire to avoid duplicating binary versions of scintilla, it is up to the Anjuta developers to make the decision to instead track against a specific version of scintilla instead of including it within Anjuta.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ptnuevgaib64uupp6it6hv3kjm9vg743cl>