Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 14:41:34 -0400 From: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@rogers.com> To: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] anjuta-devel update Message-ID: <ptnuevgaib64uupp6it6hv3kjm9vg743cl@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <1055862346.333.34.camel@asa.gascom.net.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 17 Jun 2003 19:05:47 +0400, you wrote: >I've made anjuta-devel and scintilla patches so, than it now uses system >scintilla. Scintilla is also updated to 1.53. With newer system >scintilla anjuta-1.1.1 works _very_ stable, but font antialiasing in >editor window is gone. I think scintilla update must be committed anyway >with possible empty neighbour port like scintilla-gtk2. Why would you downgrade Anjuta this way? One of the key points to moving to Gnome2/GTK2 is for antialiased fonts so removing them from Anjuta seems to be a backward step. Similarly, changing the Anjuta code base in a dramatic way is only going to cause problems for the Anjuta developers and FreeBSD users (sorry, we can't help FreeBSD users with their problems because FreeBSD is not using our codebase, etc.). While I can understand the desire to avoid duplicating binary versions of scintilla, it is up to the Anjuta developers to make the decision to instead track against a specific version of scintilla instead of including it within Anjuta.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ptnuevgaib64uupp6it6hv3kjm9vg743cl>