Date: 15 Mar 2001 23:12:54 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make Makefile Message-ID: <xzp7l1qptp5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:06:31 -0800" References: <20010315150231.B362@elvis.mu.org> <200103151033.f2FAX1q89921@freefall.freebsd.org> <200103151656.f2FGuF923193@harmony.village.org> <20010315150231.B362@elvis.mu.org> <200103152109.f2FL9S925102@harmony.village.org> <20010315140631.B50446@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 02:09:28PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > Recent discussions tend to point out that MAINTAINER has gone badly > > awry and that asserting MAINTAINERship as anything like an exclusive > > lock should only be done in rare instances (new code, code being > > maintained out, complex code people have a history of breaking). > So which of the above reasons was used to bop ru on the head for his > atacontrol commit? Non apply. You mean "Less than four hours old" doesn't qualify as "new code"? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7l1qptp5.fsf>