Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 04 Apr 2000 10:33:00 -0700
From:      David Johnson <djohnson@acuson.com>
To:        freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Another Tool
Message-ID:  <38EA274C.71D652CB@acuson.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10003311029510.413-100000@mlduke.concentric.net> <20000403230947.A23420@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nik Clayton wrote:

> Not all Unix commands have man pages.  Some of them (particularly GNU
> programs) prefer the "info" format.  Try

<tongue in cheek>
That's because GNU's Not Unix(tm). Anything they can do to violate
proven and time tested Unix standards, GNU will do.
</tongue in cheek>

(tongue back in cheek, but frustration still unchecked)
There is little more frustrating than to bring up a man page under any
variety of Linux and see the words "This documentation is obsolete".
This is primarily due to the pervasive nature of GNU software in Linux*.
There is a purpose for man pages, but the FSF does not seem to
comprehend what it is. It doesn't matter if they feel man to be
technically or morally inferior to info or not, millions of people rely
on man. How much work is it converting documentation you already have
from info to man format?

David

-----
(*)Why some of these mulimillion dollar Linux distributors don't step up
to the plate and start writing basic documentation is beyond me...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38EA274C.71D652CB>