Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:06:38 -0400
From:      Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
To:        Stephen.Clark@seclark.us
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: proxy arp on 6.1
Message-ID:  <4720B0FE.1030001@seclark.us>
In-Reply-To: <471F8C41.7030503@seclark.us>
References:  <471F8C41.7030503@seclark.us>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen Clark wrote:

>Hello List,
>
>I must be doing something wrong. I can't seem to get proxy arp to work. 
>Is there some
>magic.
>
>I have the following setup isp router 205.x.x.1 <-> 205.x.x.100/25 rl1 
>freebsd vr0 205.x.x.129/25
><-> 205.x.x.193/25
>arp -an
>(205.x.x.1) at 00:13:7f:5a:b5:50 on rl1 [ethernet]
>(205.x.x.193) at 00:30:18:a3:44:2d on vr0 permanent published (proxy 
>only) [ethernet]
>
>tcpdump
>13:09:51.386793 arp who-has 205.x.x.193 tell 205.x.x.1
>
>but there is no arp-reply from freebsd.
>
>rl1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>        options=8<VLAN_MTU>
>        inet 205.x.x.100 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 205.x.x.127
>        ether 00:30:18:a3:47:a4
>        media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
>        status: active
>
>
>  
>
Hi List,

I am looking at if_ether.c on current 6.2 and it looks to me like
net.link.ether.inet.proxyall has to be set to 1 for proxy arp to
work. Am I reading this correctly? If so this is misleading based on
the description of this sysctl in man 4 arp.

Also is anybody using proxy arp?

Thanks,
Steve

-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty 
decreases."  (Thomas Jefferson)






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4720B0FE.1030001>