Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 13:49:35 -0700 (PDT) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Achim Patzner <ap@bnc.net> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can anybody terminate an IP-IP tunnel for me? Message-ID: <20070608134658.G85746@ns1.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <232616AA-03AF-4909-9177-CCE2E3CFF53C@bnc.net> References: <200706081547.l58FlEsb084443@lurza.secnetix.de> <20070608113000.E85226@ns1.feral.com> <232616AA-03AF-4909-9177-CCE2E3CFF53C@bnc.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 08.06.2007, at 20:31, mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: >> The only problem here is that this isn't a solution for providing routing >> for somebody else's Class C block. > > Why? > > inetnum: 192.109.197.0 - 192.109.197.255 > netname: LEMIS-LAN > descr: LEMIS Lehey Microcomputer Systems > descr: D-W-6324 Feldatal > descr: Germany > country: DE > admin-c: GL3-RIPE > tech-c: GL3-RIPE > rev-srv: allegro.lemis.de > rev-srv: ns.cls.net > rev-srv: ns.maz.net > mnt-by: AS2871-MNT > status: ASSIGNED PI > source: RIPE # Filtered > > Its current provider was able to add it to their AS, too so it shouldn't be > that much of a problem in Australia. I remember my ISP (QSC Germany) being a > bit too... unexperienced at first so they sent me on to one of their > resellers (who knew how to configure BGP) and they warned me that they > wouldn't accept anything less than a /22 but things might be a bit different > on the wrong side of the planet. > > I'd just get the defunct rev-srv records out of the database entry and send > an update for the ownership records. In general ISPs are now very reluctant do less than a /22 or larget if it's not carved out of one of their blocks. It was a fair amount of hunting around in Menlo Park for me to find somebody to route FERAL.COM, and the big home serving ISPs like Sprint and Yahoo!/SBC were completely clueless about being asked if they would do so- even for a fee. -matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070608134658.G85746>