Date: 13 Feb 2001 15:32:57 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: dodi maryanto <dodi@maxwell.itb.ac.id> Cc: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Secure Servers (SMTP, POP3, FTP) Message-ID: <xzp1yt2y7om.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: dodi maryanto's message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:23:13 %2B0000 (GMT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10102132119020.52030-100000@cache.bi.itb.ac.id>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dodi maryanto <dodi@maxwell.itb.ac.id> writes: > > Can you show that inetd is significantly larger and/or slower than > > tcp-server? As for ease of configuration, the format of inetd.conf is > > straightforward and well documented. > if you have many rule to set, cdb format is very fast to read. > ( cdb is a standard db file for djb-ware ). yes, it is also easy to > configure even with poor documentation. Reading the rules is something you only do very rarely - on a production machine, you only do it once, at boot. It's just not relevant. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp1yt2y7om.fsf>