Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:43:41 +0200 From: Ott =?iso-8859-1?q?K=F6stner?= <ottk@zzz.ee> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: listserver problems? Message-ID: <200812181443.41413.ottk@zzz.ee> In-Reply-To: <494A3835.30302@secnap.net> References: <494A3835.30302@secnap.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 18 December 2008 1:47:01 pm Michael Scheidell wrote: > might be generic listserver issues, but I noticed that at least on > freebsd-jail list, it does NOT strip out dkim/domainkeys signatures. > > that might not be to bad, but it does 'mung' the headers, so dkim signed > email passed through freebsd mailing list server comes back as a forged > signature. Probably depends, how and with what software you check it. At least, SpamAssassin responds correctly to this signature: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Checker-URL: http://info.zzz.ee Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by zzz.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CBEFD53A for <ottk@zzz.ee>; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:48:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81916315A; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDEC106571F; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B19D1065679; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from fl.us.spammertrap.net (fl.us.spammertrap.net [204.89.241.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338948FC32; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@secnap.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E43E6089; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:02 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=secnap.net; h= content-type:subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date :message-id:received:received:x-virus-scanned; s=dkim; t= 1229600821; bh=D2GNQjbJ0V6T+z6wbS0oY6z3CMZTNqKW4+nF83Mp06k=; b=Y tjC87NB2Vu+z8zFh6JMsKQhxhlNafGj3yyQMJW/EvfyDDQxsMWtvx/kx5gRJnHDD oJOt0zcSAXUTiD/EhOuRCrb3KOr1nErTcWPns31B44q/4dL7l09vnuT+VswvRZoZ 3jZFZZGHZRr2FtOjgdDQkJKZIk0elPc2i67Bif30Hc= X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - fl.us.spammertrap.net X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) SME-150 1.89 at fl.us.spammertrap.net Received: from secnap3.secnap.com (secnap3.secnap.com [204.89.241.130]) by fl.us.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99E5E6088; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from 21.sub-70-222-163.myvzw.com ([10.80.0.4]) by secnap3.secnap.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:47:01 -0500 Message-ID: <494A3835.30302@secnap.net> > whoever is working on the listservers can contact me for assistance on > it. maybe just a postfix header IGNORE rule would strip it back out. Talking about Mailman configuration, personally I would like if these mailinglists here had 'subject_prefix', something like [FreeBSD-QUESTIONS:%d] Greetings, O.K. -- Mõõda oma inteneti kiirust / Test Your Internet speed http://tallinn.speedtest.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200812181443.41413.ottk>