Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2003 16:37:52 +0200 From: Eivind Olsen <eivind@aminor.no> To: current@FreeBSD.org Cc: grog@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: vinum bug? (Re: Yet another crash in FreeBSD 5.1) Message-ID: <1324937.1059842272@[192.168.0.2]> In-Reply-To: <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <1079.192.168.0.3.1059811884.squirrel@webmail.aminor.no> <20030802090052.GA25338@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[Sending to current@freebsd, and Kris copied in Greg so I'll also do that] --On 2. august 2003 02:00 -0700 Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: >> db> trace >> g_dev_strategy(c2156024,c2153800,0,cfb528d0,c2099eca) at >> g_dev_strategy+0x29 launch_requests(c299bf00,0,10000,ffffffff,47) at >> launch_requests+0x448 vinumstart(c5ada2d0,0,c22ab000,cfb5294c,c02e5bc6) >> at vinumstart+0x2b2 vinumstrategy(c5ada2d0,0,c09719b0,40,0) at >> vinumstrategy+0xa6 > Looks like a problem in vinum. The other backtrace was the same, right? Basically the same, yes. Some differences (and many similarities) in the addresses that were referenced. And also almost the same output from the "trace" command (I see that my first example is missing the dofilewrite() between vn_write() and write() but that might just be because I've forgotten to write down that line (I wrote all this down by hand). So, it looks like it's the same crash again (well, it does look like that to my untrained eye). -- Regards / Hilsen Eivind Olsen <eivind@aminor.no>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1324937.1059842272>