Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:08:53 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: mdf@freebsd.org Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r231220 - head/sys/sys Message-ID: <20120209090853.GY3283@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm_pWHjnZHstK9dA%2BJ90UiQMaHoR-S=5rRL8-q%2BX2Z2vcg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201202081836.q18Ia7jw055652@svn.freebsd.org> <CAMBSHm_pWHjnZHstK9dA%2BJ90UiQMaHoR-S=5rRL8-q%2BX2Z2vcg@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:21:59AM -0800, mdf@freebsd.org wrote: > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Author: kib > > Date: Wed Feb š8 18:36:07 2012 > > New Revision: 231220 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/231220 > > > > Log: > > šTrim 8 unused bytes from struct vnode on 64-bit architectures. > > Doesn't this change the KBI? So should __FreeBSD_version be bumped? Definitely, it changes the KBI. This is the reason I did not specified MFC period (but really wanted it). We do not track KBI changes on HEAD with __FreeBSD_version. IMO, __FreeBSD_version is more about KPI, and even for KPI, it is more at the discretion of the committer and usefulness of notification. With this change, all VFS modules must be recompiled. But HEAD had a lot of changes related to VFS interface which went in silently. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk8zjSUACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4ikOwCcDjK3GfY2e+O9zHjBbG1N+WC2 jxkAoJY8rC1thtr4sfL2rI9RD+x6/dCk =5grN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120209090853.GY3283>