Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:29:59 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> Cc: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/92516: ActivSupport, Inc. - Your Flexible IT Partner Message-ID: <20060210162959.GA11095@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060210162417.GH1607@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> References: <200602022300.k12N0S93015090@freefall.freebsd.org> <20060210142519.GA3192@flame.pc> <7B11032B-0661-498E-A47D-FE2E7ABCB177@submonkey.net> <20060210162417.GH1607@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006-02-10 17:24, Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> wrote: >On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:30:17PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: >>On 10 Feb 2006, at 14:25, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >>> Do they really support FreeBSD? I'm not against adding this, but >>> frankly I'm a bit annoyed that their front page *does* mention >>> Microsoft, Cisco and a few other names but has no obvious link for >>> FreeBSD. >>> >>> The only bit of information that is vaguely relevant to FreeBSD is a >>> single occurence of the word "Unix" near the bottom of the page. >> >> We're not listed on the Technologies page (and everything else is), >> so I don't think we should carry the listing. > > There is a mention on: > > http://www.activsupport.com/Small-Business-Network-Consulting-Services-Firm_17_Computer-Network-Consultant-for-Small-Business_16_San-Francisco-Bay-Area.html > > Found it though google with site:www.activsupport.com. I see. It still feels a bit silly that big commercial players get a mention in a special "Technology" section, right there in the front page, but FreeBSD is hidden so down that one has to use Google to find it. I'm not opposing adding a link now that I know FreeBSD *is* mentioned somewhere, even though it would make me a lot happier to see a more prominent appearance :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060210162959.GA11095>