Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:01:45 +0100 From: "Heinz Knocke" <knockefreebsd@o2.pl> To: "Joshua Blanton" <jblanton@masaka.cs.OhioU.Edu> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What will do the TCP stack in the described scenario? Message-ID: <005601c4f579$d4e03d50$df5561d9@ALFA> References: <004a01c4f43c$521af510$df5561d9@ALFA><20050107105735.GC29573@jtb.ipx.ath.cx> <004c01c4f579$2a0d7730$df5561d9@ALFA>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Heinz Knocke" <knockefreebsd@o2.pl> To: "Joshua Blanton" <jblanton@masaka.cs.OhioU.Edu> Cc: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 12:56 PM Subject: Re: What will do the TCP stack in the described scenario? > As you can see the reciever doesn't ACK segments 3807198814 to > 3807202910 which are the last sent by the sender (not like I > previously wrote - packet before the last one). Could you please > explain this behaviour? .. I should have also add, that those dupacks, as I can see in the reciever's side packet dump, were not dropped by the congested network, they weren't send at all ... hk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005601c4f579$d4e03d50$df5561d9>