Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 13:01:45 +0100 From: "Heinz Knocke" <knockefreebsd@o2.pl> To: "Joshua Blanton" <jblanton@masaka.cs.OhioU.Edu> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What will do the TCP stack in the described scenario? Message-ID: <005601c4f579$d4e03d50$df5561d9@ALFA> References: <004a01c4f43c$521af510$df5561d9@ALFA><20050107105735.GC29573@jtb.ipx.ath.cx> <004c01c4f579$2a0d7730$df5561d9@ALFA>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
----- Original Message ----- From: "Heinz Knocke" <knockefreebsd@o2.pl> To: "Joshua Blanton" <jblanton@masaka.cs.OhioU.Edu> Cc: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 12:56 PM Subject: Re: What will do the TCP stack in the described scenario? > As you can see the reciever doesn't ACK segments 3807198814 to > 3807202910 which are the last sent by the sender (not like I > previously wrote - packet before the last one). Could you please > explain this behaviour? .. I should have also add, that those dupacks, as I can see in the reciever's side packet dump, were not dropped by the congested network, they weren't send at all ... hkhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005601c4f579$d4e03d50$df5561d9>