Date: Mon, 24 Aug 1998 21:09:21 +1200 From: "Dan Langille" <junkmale@xtra.co.nz> To: Craig Beasland <craig@hotmix.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: NT vs FreeBSD Message-ID: <199808240909.VAA13178@witch.xtra.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <002e01bdcf31$1b3f6ad0$0a1e21cb@superbruce.hotmix.com.au> References: <19980821141844.16052.qmail@wolf.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Aug 98, at 15:33, Craig Beasland wrote: > Also, a well built NT box is more secure than a poorly built BSD one - > wouldn't you agree. Is the above indeed what you meant to say? I would have expected something like 'less secure' to be mentioned on a FreeBSD mailing list. -- Dan Langille DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - my [mis]adventures http://www.dvl-software.com/freebsd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808240909.VAA13178>